Examining the Four-Day School Week: Is It Really in Our Students’ Best Interest?
The recent research findings from the University of Oregon College of Education’s HEDCO Institute have stirred up plenty of discussion among educators, parents, and policy makers across the state. With approximately 130 schools operating on a four-day schedule in Oregon—covering over one in ten of the state’s educational institutions—questions abound regarding the true impact of this reform on academic performance and student engagement. In this opinion editorial, we take a closer look at the arguments for and against the four-day school week while digging into the evidence that suggests possible harm to some of our most vulnerable student populations.
At its core, the issue revolves around two key aspects: academic outcomes and logistical considerations. Critics of the four-day schedule argue that it leads to lower math and reading scores, increased absenteeism, and ultimately even lower graduation rates. Meanwhile, supporters highlight benefits such as improved teacher retention, cost savings, and schedule flexibility for extracurricular activities. In this article, we will explore these areas with a neutral tone while also considering the many tangled issues associated with the change.
Understanding the Research: What Do the Studies Really Say?
The University of Oregon review combined data from 11 different studies investigating the impact of four-day school weeks. The research revealed that both rural and non-rural schools experienced lower math and reading scores when shifting to a shortened school week. In addition, a drop in five-year graduation rates was noted alongside an uptick in absenteeism. These results have sparked concerns that the modified schedule may not be the all-around solution some had hoped for.
Elizabeth Day, a research assistant professor and one of the authors of the review, noted, “The key takeaway is that we’re really just not seeing large benefits around these student outcomes and, if anything, we’re seeing negative outcomes.” It is important to point out, however, that some studies found a silver lining for rural high schools, where evidence suggested a modest improvement in math scores and graduation rates at this level when compared to peers on a traditional schedule.
Academic Performance Under Pressure: The Data Behind the Debate
Academic Outcomes in Rural and Non-Rural Settings
One of the most critical considerations when evaluating the four-day week is its impact on academic performance. The studies have shown that while some rural high schools might see a marginal gain because the overall instructional time for high school students appears to be preserved, the opposite is true for younger students. Elementary and middle school students in both rural and non-rural areas generally exhibit a decline in math and reading scores.
This phenomenon might be explained by the fact that elementary school curricula are heavily dependent on daily practice and repetition. Even slight reductions in instructional time can disrupt the cumulative learning process. In contrast, high school students may be able to adjust their study routines more flexibly, as their learning is often supplemented through homework, tutoring, or participation in extracurricular activities.
The Impact on Attendance and Graduation Rates
In addition to academic performance, the data also reveals concerning trends regarding student attendance and graduation outcomes. The review found that chronic absences are more likely to increase, particularly among rural high schoolers, on a four-day schedule. Even though the reported benefits for high school math and graduation rates might seem to offer a mixed picture, the overall increase in student absences is a clear sign that the arrangement could be interfering with consistent engagement in the learning process.
Given that regular attendance is a key predictor of academic success, this uptick in absences poses a significant risk—especially for students who already struggle to remain engaged or who rely on in-person support systems. As educators and policy makers, we must carefully weigh these outcomes against any supposed benefits.
Budget Considerations and Teacher Recruitment: A Mixed Bag of Benefits
Financial Savings Versus Academic Costs
When schools began converting to a four-day week, one of the main reasons cited was cost savings. Districts anticipated that a shorter school week would reduce operational costs—ranging from transportation expenses to utilities and staffing costs on the fifth day. While these savings might appear attractive, the trade-offs in academic performance and increased absenteeism warrant a closer examination.
In many meetings with superintendents, the focus seems to have pivoted increasingly from immediate financial concerns to issues such as teacher recruitment and retention. Many administrators now see the modified schedule as a “win” for teacher satisfaction and work-life balance. However, these benefits rarely come with measurable improvements in student test scores or academic milestones, an issue that should not be overlooked.
Teacher Retention and Recruitment: The Untold Story
Teacher retention and recruitment are among the super important issues facing districts today. The extra day off can create a more relaxed schedule for educators, which, in a field often characterized by nerve-racking expectations and overwhelming workloads, can be seen as a key attraction. This benefit, however, has largely been subjective and hard to measure in terms of academic outcomes.
Many superintendents and school board decision-makers emphasize that improved teacher morale is a significant driver behind the four-day week. They mention that a shorter week provides educators extra time to recharge, pursue professional development, or simply handle personal matters. While these factors contribute to a generally positive work environment, it becomes complicated when trying to objectively tie them to improved student learning outcomes.
Below is a table summarizing some of the pros and cons associated with the four-day schedule:
| Potential Benefits | Possible Drawbacks |
|---|---|
|
|
Community and Parental Perspectives: Weighing the Intangible Effects
Parental Concerns Over Reduced Learning Time
For many parents, the decision to move to a four-day week is riddled with tension and concerns about their children’s overall academic preparedness. Parents worry that the reduced number of days in school could mean less instructional time, which in turn might affect homework loads, test preparation, and overall academic growth. In communities where after-school programs are not readily available, these concerns can feel all the more acute.
Critics argue that without additional programming on the off day—or without a robust plan to supplement instruction—the children might be left to fend for themselves academically. Given the crucial importance of daily practice and structured learning, abandoning an extra day of classroom instruction may not be in the super important interest of students who require consistent academic support.
Community Involvement in Decision-Making
Another facet that cannot be neglected is the community’s role in influencing such policy decisions. In many districts, the move to a four-day week was driven more by budget constraints and the pressing need for teacher retention rather than by a careful, community-wide evaluation of academic outcomes. For instance, in Northeast Oregon’s Imbler School District, community support and teacher enthusiasm were cited as key reasons for piloting the four-day week.
While it is certainly crucial to listen to the insights from educators and parents, we must remember that the shift has significant implications for the students’ hidden academic pieces. A broader community conversation is necessary—a dialogue that weighs the savings and improved staff morale against potential declines in student achievement. In other words, this is not a decision that should be taken lightly, and it certainly requires careful thought and collaboration with every stakeholder.
Extracurricular Benefits and the Real-Life Impact on Students
Balancing Academics with Extracurriculars: A Double-Edged Sword
Many advocates of the four-day school week point to the added flexibility it offers, particularly in accommodating extracurricular activities such as sports. High school athletes, for example, benefit from the ability to concentrate on their athletic commitments without worrying about missing critical academic instruction on game days. This benefit may explain the modest improvements in graduation rates and math scores observed in some rural high schools.
However, it is essential not to overlook the flip side: for younger students who do not have structured extracurricular activities or the maturity to manage self-directed learning during an extra day off, the four-day week may prove more of a challenge than a benefit. For these students, the tangible academic costs might outweigh the advantages provided by scheduling flexibility.
Managing After-School Programs and Supplemental Learning
In the wake of the four-day week, some districts have made strides to provide supportive after-school programs to help bridge the gap in instructional time. These community initiatives often focus on tutoring, enrichment activities, and social-emotional learning to cushion the potential academic dip. It is critical for districts adopting the four-day schedule to invest wisely in these programs and ensure that all children have access to additional learning opportunities during the off day.
Below are some key strategies school districts might consider to offset the possible drawbacks:
- Partner with local libraries and community centers to offer supplementary educational programs.
- Implement targeted tutoring sessions for elementary and middle school students.
- Organize structured enrichment activities during school holidays and non-instructional days.
- Encourage parental involvement through workshops that empower parents to support home learning.
- Explore digital learning solutions to provide virtual instruction on the fifth day.
Addressing the Confusing Bits: Significance of Instructional Time
The Critical Role of Daily Instruction
One of the central points of contention around the four-day school week revolves around the total instructional time that students receive. Critics note that when school districts cut out a full day of classroom teaching, the cumulative effect over the course of a school year can result in significantly fewer classroom hours. The loss of this extra day is especially problematic for the early grades, where consistent, daily reinforcement plays a pivotal role in long-term academic growth.
Educators argue that every day in school matters, particularly for younger learners. Whether it is mastering basic math concepts or reading comprehension, the day-to-day progress builds into the larger picture of academic development. Unfortunately, the condensed schedule may leave some fine points of instruction unaddressed, potentially leading to gaps in students’ knowledge.
Reallocating Instructional Time: Is There a Workable Solution?
Some districts, aware of the potential pitfalls, have attempted to reallocate the lost instructional time. One proposal has been to extend the school day on the four days that students are in attendance, thereby attempting to maintain the overall number of instructional hours. However, this approach comes with its own set of challenges. Extended school days have been known to be intimidating and nerve-racking, not only for younger students but also for overburdened teachers who already face complicated schedules and tricky parts of the daily curriculum.
A balanced approach might involve a blend of extended classroom sessions with supplemental programs on the non-school day. This strategy, though appealing on paper, requires significant coordination among educators, families, and community organizations. Additionally, research must closely monitor the smaller differences in student performance as districts experiment with new models of scheduling. In the end, we need more comprehensive studies to understand both the benefits and the hidden issues associated with restructuring instructional time.
Policy Implications: What Should Education Leaders Consider?
Weighing the Budget Benefits Against Academic Outcomes
From a policy perspective, the move to a four-day school week brings about a host of tricky parts that must be carefully considered. In many cases, the decision is driven by financial pressures and the need to streamline operational expenses. However, as the evidence shows, there is a potential trade-off between budget savings and academic effectiveness. For instance, while school districts may save money on transportation and utility costs, there is a risk that reduced classroom time may impair academic growth in key subject areas like math and reading.
Policy makers must consider if, ultimately, the savings justify the apparent increases in chronic student absences and delayed academic milestones. The decision-making process in this area should involve a collaborative approach with input from educators, parents, and community stakeholders to ensure that all voices are heard when navigating these tricky financial and academic turns.
Teacher Retention as a Policy Priority
Another critical angle for policy makers to consider is the impact of the four-day week on teacher recruitment and retention. In a time when the teaching profession is often described as overwhelming and off-putting due to heavy workloads and limited resources, offering a shorter week could be seen as a super important benefit. Yet, despite the improved teacher morale and reduced classroom fatigue, the direct benefits on student outcomes remain elusive.
Some suggest that enhanced teacher satisfaction might eventually translate into better instructional quality. However, research data must catch up with these assumptions. Policy makers should keep in mind that while teacher well-being is essential, it should not come at the expense of the quality of education that students receive—especially when considering the fine details of academic performance metrics.
Building Consensus: The Need for Transparent Decision-Making
Engaging Stakeholders in a Collaborative Process
Recent experiences with the four-day school week underscore the importance of involving all pertinent parties in the decision-making process. Rather than unilaterally opting for a schedule that saves money or pleases a subset of the community, school superintendents must work through a comprehensive strategy that examines the entire impact—from academic performance to social and emotional development.
In practical terms, this means engaging in open forums, community meetings, and stakeholder consultations that cover everything from the extra day’s use to supplemental learning initiatives. Stakeholders ranging from teachers, parents, students, and local community leaders should all have a say in the discussion. After all, educational policy decisions are meant to serve one overriding goal: the success and well-being of our students.
Creating a Feedback Loop for Continuous Improvement
One of the most effective ways to tackle the confusing bits and mixed outcomes of a four-day school week is to implement a robust system for feedback and continuous improvement. For instance, districts that have adopted this schedule should periodically survey teachers, parents, and students to gather insights on the success and challenges of the model. This feedback can then guide adjustments, ensuring that any negative impacts on academic performance are addressed swiftly and efficiently.
It is also worth noting that some districts have already begun reaching out to research institutions, like the HEDCO Institute, asking pointed questions about student outcomes in the four-day model. By creating this dynamic feedback loop, districts can help ensure that the system evolves over time based on concrete evidence and community input rather than assumptions or short-term financial gains.
Digging into the Little Details: What the Research Might Be Missing
Understanding the Fifth Day: Classroom vs. Home Learning
One aspect that remains relatively unexplored in most of the current research is what students do on the additional day off from school. The potential for home-based learning, community activities, or even part-time work adds additional layers to the discussion. The missing details include understanding precisely how the loss of an extra day in the classroom might affect not only academic performance but also social interaction and overall student well-being.
While some rural districts appear to have found a workable balance, the status of non-rural areas remains less clear. Do students have access to tutoring, supervised programs, or other forms of structured learning on the off day? Without these supports, the reduced classroom time might simply lead to gaps in learning that are hard to remediate later on. This calls for more fine-grained research into the day-to-day lives of students impacted by the new schedule.
Assessing the Amount of Instructional Time
Beyond what happens on the off day, another hidden complexity is the actual change in total instructional time during a school year with a four-day week. Some districts have claimed that they manage to make up for the lost day by lengthening the remaining school days, while others have not compensated at all. The impact of these different approaches is loaded with issues and merits serious consideration.
For parents and educators alike, the number of hours that a student spends under the direct guidance of a teacher is a key indicator of potential success. Any policy that potentially cuts into that instructional time requires careful analysis. Stakeholders should ask: Is the extra day off simply a cost-saving measure, or can the lost day be transformed into an opportunity for alternative modes of effective learning?
The Way Forward: Balancing Flexibility With Accountability
A Hybrid Model as a Possible Compromise
Given the mixed outcomes highlighted by the current research, a potential way forward could be the exploration of hybrid models that integrate the benefits of both four-day and five-day schedules. For instance, school districts might consider a flexible model where core instructional hours are preserved while still offering an occasional off day for teacher planning and extracurricular activities. Such a model would allow districts to reap some of the cost and morale benefits without compromising on the essential classroom time that students need.
Adopting a hybrid model would require policy makers to figure a path through conflicting priorities and manage the intricate balance between cost savings and academic effectiveness. It might also involve periodic reassessment of the model’s impact, ensuring that any risks to student achievement are identified early and mitigated before they grow into more significant problems.
Investing in Supplemental Programs and Community Resources
Another strategy to consider is a stronger investment in supplemental programs that support students on their off day from school. Programs that provide tutoring, homework clubs, and enrichment activities can help bridge the gap in direct classroom instruction. This approach would not only address the immediate challenges posed by a reduced instructional schedule but also help in building a more resilient educational framework that can adapt to changing circumstances.
Community centers, libraries, and local organizations can all play a part in this collaborative effort. By pooling resources and working together, educators and local leaders can create a safety net for students, ensuring that the additional day off does not lead to a significant learning deficit.
Looking at the Big Picture: Long-Term Implications for Students
Preparing Students for Future Academic and Career Success
The debate about the four-day school week goes beyond immediate academic outcomes—it also touches on how we prepare our students for the long haul. Today’s decisions have consequences that stretch into college, careers, and beyond. Comprehensive educational planning that takes into account both short-term efficiencies and long-term student success is essential.
If certain groups of students, particularly younger learners, continue to exhibit lower reading and math scores due to reduced instruction, then the school system risks creating ongoing educational disparities. These gaps might manifest later as students progress to higher education or enter the workforce, potentially undermining the broader goals of educational equity and economic advancement in the community.
Ensuring Equitable Access to Quality Education
While the idea of a four-day school week might seem like an appealing solution to multiple funding and staffing challenges, it is super important to ensure that no student is left behind. For education policies to be truly sustainable, they must promote equal opportunity. This means paying close attention to the subtle details that affect different student populations in diverse environments—urban, suburban, and rural alike.
In an ideal system, every child should have access to consistent, high-quality instruction regardless of the scheduling model. This calls for a concerted effort to monitor the progress of all students and to implement tailored interventions where necessary. With rigorous follow-up and evidence-based adjustments, school districts can work to ensure that the benefits of any new schedule are distributed equitably.
Community Voices: What Do Parents and Educators Really Think?
Teacher and Administrator Perspectives
In conversations with school superintendents and administrators, a recurring theme is the recognition that the modified schedule was never solely about improved test scores. Rather, it was about creating a more balanced work environment for teachers and a learning environment that could potentially foster greater community involvement. Many of these educators describe the four-day week as a tool to help manage the overwhelming burdens of the traditional five-day model—offering a nerve-racking break from daily classroom challenges.
However, while teacher satisfaction is essential, it must be weighed carefully against the possibility that some elementary and middle school students might be experiencing declines in essential skills. Administrators are encouraged to think about these issues not in isolation but as part of a broader strategy that incorporates continual feedback from student performance and community well-being.
Parental Insights and Community Feedback
Parents, on the other hand, often express mixed feelings about the shortened week. Some appreciate the extra day for family time and extracurricular engagements, while others are concerned about the potential for academic regression. The discrepancies in feedback can arise from differences in community resources, parental involvement levels, and the availability of structured learning activities on the off day.
For many families, the issue of an extra day off of school is compounded by the lack of adequate childcare and after-school programs. In communities where parents must work long hours, the absence of reliable supervision during the off day might result in less than optimal academic or social development. Therefore, any policy decision needs to take into account not just the economic benefits or teacher satisfaction but also the everyday realities faced by students and families alike.
Charting a Path Forward: Recommendations for Decision Makers
Adopt a Collaborative and Data-Driven Approach
Given all the evidence and varied opinions surrounding the four-day school week, it is clear that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be the solution. Instead, school districts should consider adopting a hybrid or flexible model, which allows for adjustments based on concrete data and community feedback. Key recommendations for decision makers include:
- Engage Stakeholders: Regularly involve educators, parents, and community leaders in discussions about scheduling changes.
- Monitor Academic Outcomes: Use standardized tests and teacher assessments to track progress and identify areas of concern early.
- Invest in Supplemental Learning Opportunities: Provide after-school tutoring, weekend workshops, and online learning resources to compensate for reduced classroom time.
- Evaluate Financial Impacts: Balance operational savings against the potential costs associated with remedial educational programs.
- Review and Revise Policies Periodically: Establish a review cycle to assess the overall impact on academic performance and adjust strategies as needed.
Ensure Evidence-Based Policy Adjustments
It is super important that policy makers base their decisions on a blend of data-driven research and firsthand community feedback. This means not only counting the financial savings and teacher retention rates but also scrutinizing the performance trends of math, reading, and overall engagement. As more districts consider modifications to the traditional calendar, it would be wise to collaborate with research institutions like the HEDCO Institute to gather the nitty-gritty details that can inform well-rounded decisions.
In addition, policy makers should be cautious about adopting sweeping changes without fully understanding the small distinctions in how different student groups are affected. In this sense, ongoing research, including longitudinal studies tracking students over several years, will be key to pinpointing the lasting consequences of these schedule changes.
Conclusion: Striking the Right Balance for Educational Success
As we weigh the evidence and consider the many conflicting factors at play, it becomes clear that the four-day school week is not a straightforward solution. The potential academic drawbacks, particularly for elementary and middle school students, must be balanced against the benefits of cost savings and improved teacher satisfaction. While some rural districts may see modest improvements for high schoolers, the overall data highlights significant challenges—especially when it comes to sustaining consistent engagement and preserving instructional time.
The decision to shift to a four-day week should be approached as a community effort, involving educators, parents, and policy makers in a transparent, iterative process. Only through open dialogue and continual adjustments can we hope to find a model that provides an optimal balance between academic achievement and the operational benefits that a shorter week might offer.
In the end, our primary obligation must be to ensure that every student has access to high-quality education. As we figure a path through these tricky parts and navigate the many twists and turns of modern educational challenges, we must remain committed to using solid research and honest community feedback to guide our collective decisions. Whether through a hybrid model, supplemental programs, or other innovative strategies, the goal remains the same: to create a learning environment that nurtures both academic success and overall well-being for every student.
In conclusion, while the four-day school week offers several attractive benefits—including financial savings and improved teacher retention—it is crucial that these perks do not inadvertently compromise the quality of education that our students receive. By adopting a balanced approach, investing in supplemental support, and actively engaging our communities, we can work together to mitigate the negative outcomes reported in recent studies and ensure that any schedule changes serve the best interests of our children. This issue, full of challenging and tangled issues, deserves ongoing attention, open dialogue, and a firm commitment to the long-term academic success of every student in our educational system.
Originally Post From https://www.oregonlive.com/education/2025/07/1-in-10-oregon-schools-operate-4-days-a-week-this-schedule-may-harm-students-review-finds.html
Read more about this topic at
The four-day workweek paradox
Four-Day Workweek: A Dream Come True or a Potential …
